What's New in the Journals? not only reviews new publications in the peer-reviewed literature, it also comments on their relevance and suggests how you might use them in eye care practice. Follow the links to view the abstract of the paper or full text.
*NEW* Pult H, Murphy PJ and Purslow C. A novel method to predict the dry eye symptoms in new contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci 2009:86:9 1042-1050.
What clinical signs and tests can best predict which patients are likely to experience dryness symptoms with soft contact lenses? A study from researchers at Cardiff University, published in Optometry & Vision Science, provides useful guidance.
The study investigates whether a combination of lid wiper epitheliopathy (LWE) and lid parallel conjunctival folds (LIPCOF) plus other tear film tests and subjective evaluation before contact lens fitting could predict contact lens-induced dry eye.
Signs and tests were investigated in 33 new soft contact lens wearers. Symptoms were evaluated by the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) and subjects grouped according to their response to a Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire (20 symptomatic and 13 asymptomatic). Subjects were fitted with vifilcon A (Focus Visitint) and senofilcon A (Acuvue Oasys) lenses for a 2-week period, consecutively.
Among the findings were:
· LIPCOF non-invasive break-up time (NIBUT), and OSDI were better predictors than hyperaemia, tear meniscus height, phenol red thread test, staining, and LWE
· Limbal hyperaemia decreased in senofilcon A lenses
· Wearing comfort among symptomatic wearers was better with senofilcon A
· Subjects who became symptomatic had decreased NIBUT and increased LIPCOF and OSDI at enrolment
The authors say the best test combination to predict the development of contact lens-induced dry eye is NIBUT plus LIPCOF Sum (Nasal,+ Temporal grades) and OSDI. This combination of clinical tests has been named the Contact-Lens-Predicting-Test.
CLICK HERE TO ACCESS THE ABSTRACT
CLICK HERE FOR THE OSDI QUESTIONNAIRE
What we think: LWE and LIPCOF have already been shown to be associated with dryness symptoms in experienced contact lens wearers. This new study shows that LIPCOF, combined with NIBUT and an index of symptoms, is a useful predictor of dry eye problems in new wearers. The study findings also demonstrate the benefits of the silicone hydrogel lens used in the study over a conventional hydrogel.
USE THIS IN YOUR PRACTICE TO:
• Add LWE and LIPCOF to the signs you look for in existing and prospective contact lens wearers
• Apply this combination of signs and tests to predict dry eye symptoms in new soft lens wearers and select an appropriate lens material
• Recommend this silicone hydrogel to improve comfort in symptomatic wearers
*NEW* Vitale S, Sperduto RD and Ferris FL. Increased prevalence of myopia in the United States between 1971-1972 and 1999-2004. Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:12 1632-1639 .
The prevalence of myopia in the US has increased significantly since the 1970s, according to a study published in Archives of Ophthalmology.
The 1971-1972 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey provided the earliest nationally representative estimates for US myopia prevalence. Using a similar method for diagnosing myopia, the authors examined data from the 1999-2004 survey to determine whether myopia prevalence had changed during the 30 years between the two surveys. Results showed:
-
• The estimated prevalence of myopia in persons aged 12 to 54 years was 66% higher in 1999-2004 than in 1971-1972 (42% vs 25%)
• Prevalence estimates were higher in 1999-2004 than in 1971-1972 for all levels of myopia, although overall the prevalence of severe myopia was low
• Prevalence estimates increased by 64% for males and 69% for females
• The increase was greater for black individuals (33% vs 13%) than white individuals (43% vs 26%)
• Differences in prevalence between the two surveys remained statistically significant among those with 12 or more years of formal education
-
The authors observe that although myopia can be treated relatively easily with corrective lenses, the associated costs on a population basis are high. Identifying modifiable risk factors for myopia could lead to cost-effective interventional strategies, they say.
CLICK HERE TO ACCESS THE ABSTRACT OF THE PAPER
What we think: Studies have reported an ‘epidemic’ of myopia among young Asian populations but few data are available for the US. Increasing levels of education, near-work demands and possible genetic susceptibility have been cited as factors. Commenting on their findings, these authors suggest increasing use of computers and handheld devices, and spending less time outdoors, may be implicated. The steep rise in the number of myopes is clearly a major concern but also presents an opportunity for eye care professionals to provide appropriate advice and correction.
USE THIS IN YOUR PRACTICE TO:
• Answer patients’ queries about the onset of myopia
• Be aware of the latest thinking on the prevalence and aetiology of myopia
• Provide the most appropriate eye care and eyewear for your patients
*NEW* Rahi JS, Cumberland PM and Peckham CS. Visual function in working adults: early life influences and associations with health and social outcomes. Ophthalmology 2009;116:1866-71.
Impaired vision is associated with social factors such as unemployment, deprivation as well as poor health, according to a large-scale epidemiological study in the UK.
Researchers at the Institute of Child Health in London studied 9,330 adults aged 44 or 45 from the 1958 British cohort. They assessed distance, near and stereo acuities at medical examinations and recorded early life influences, and health and social outcomes in mid-adult life. They found that vision function was associated with:
· Unemployment resulting from permanent sickness
· Lower socioeconomic status
· Poorer general health
· Low birthweight or being small for gestational age
· Maternal smoking in pregnancy
· Socioeconomic deprivation in childhood
The authors highlight the importance of investigating visual function in the wider context of health and social functioning. Life-course epidemiology may prove valuable in revealing how such factors contribute to chronic eye disease in adult life.
CLICK HERE TO ACCESS THE ABSTRACT OF THE PAPER
What we think: This large population-based study provides an unusual and very useful perspective on how biological, social and lifestyle factors can influence visual function. Further work of this type may tell us more about how such factors together contribute to the cause of visually impairing conditions in later life, such as glaucoma and macular degeneration.
USE THIS IN YOUR PRACTICE TO:
• Be aware that early-life influences and social outcomes as well as health can affect visual function
• Bear this in mind when assessing the eye health of your adult patients
• Understand that factors such as birthweight and deprivation are also associated with general health and a variety of systemic conditions in adults
*NEW* Nutrition counselling in the optometric practice. Optometry, 2009:80:10 587-9.
Nutrition counselling may soon be routine for optometrists in the US following new guidelines on the care of patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD).
Among several articles on nutrition and eye health in its journal Optometry, the American Optometric Association says clinical practice guidelines to be issued early in 2010 will call on optometrists to advise patients on the benefits of proper nutrition.
The recommendations will be based on evidence from the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) that antioxidant vitamins and minerals, taken in high doses by mouth, can reduce the progression to advanced AMD by 25% and the risk of moderate vision loss by 19% in specific patients, over a five-year period.
The study recommended that patients at risk supplement their diets daily with the AREDS nutritional formulation
· 500 mg of vitamin C
· 400 IU of vitamin E
· 15 mg of beta-carotene
· 80 mg of zinc oxide
The formulation also calls for patients to take 2 mg of copper per day, because zinc supplements interfere with copper absorption. Research since the AREDS study suggests that the nutrients lutein and zeaxanthin, and the omega-3 fatty acids DHA and EPA, might also be beneficial.
Other articles in this issue of Optometry include a review of macular pigment and healthy vision, and a summary of what patients should know about nutrition.
CLICK HERE TO ACCESS THE FULL TEXT OF THE ARTICLE ON NUTRITION COUNSELLING CLICK HERE FOR THE FULL TABLE OF CONTENTSCLICK HERE FOR THE AREDS STUDY FROM 2001
What we think: AREDS showed that a specific high dose of antioxidants could help reduce the risk of advanced AMD for those already with moderate AMD, although there are concerns that taking high levels of supplements can cause other health problems. Use of lutein and zeaxanthin to prevent AMD is also subject to debate, particularly whether these should be taken as supplements to a balanced diet.
USE THIS IN YOUR PRACTICE TO:
• Find out more about the latest thinking on nutrition and the eye
• Discuss with patients the benefits of a healthy balanced diet
• Advise that those diagnosed with AMD and considering supplements should also discuss this with their doctor
*NEW* Chu BS, Wood JM and Collins MJ. Influence of presbyopic corrections on driving-related eye and head movements. Optom Vis Sci 2009;86:11 E1267-E1275.
Driving is one of the most demanding of all visual tasks and requires special consideration in presbyopes. An Australian study published in Optometry & Vision Science reveals some surprising differences between presbyopic vision corrections when viewing and responding to driving-related traffic scenes.
Twenty presbyopes (mean age 56 years) with no experience of presbyopic correction other than single vision (SV) reading spectacles each wore: distance SV lenses, progressive addition spectacles (PAL), bifocal spectacles (BIF), and monovision (MV) and multifocal contact lenses (MTF CL).
With each correction, subjects viewed video recordings of traffic scenes, tracked a reference vehicle, and identified peripheral targets. Digital numerical displays were included as near visual stimuli (simulating speedometer and radio). Results showed:
· Path length of eye movements while viewing and responding to driving-related traffic scenes was significantly longer with BIF and PAL than MV and MTF CL
· Path length of head movements was greater with all spectacle corrections than with MV and MTF CL
· No significant differences between daytime and night-time data
· Target recognition and brake response times were not significantly affected by vision correction but accuracy identifying near peripheral targets was affected
The authors say that the longer path length of eye and head movements and greater number of saccades associated with spectacle presbyopic corrections may affect driving performance by having a negative effect on attention and reaction times.
CLICK HERE TO ACCESS THE ABSTRACT OF THIS PAPER
What we think: Those concerned that monovision and multifocal contact lenses have an adverse effect on driving performance may be surprised that some of the measures investigated in this study were relatively unaffected when compared to spectacle correction. Studies using driving simulators can help us to understand better the effect of vision correction on driving performance in the real world.
USE THIS IN YOUR PRACTICE TO:
• Explain the pros and cons of different forms of presbyopic correction
• Reassure patients that some aspects of driving performance may be better with monovision and multifocal contact lenses than with spectacles
• Point out that presbyopic contact lenses have a wider field of corrected vision than presbyopic spectacles
*NEW* Doughty MJ and Glavin S. Efficacy of different dry eye treatments with artificial tears or ocular lubricants: a systematic review. Ophthal Physiol Opt 2009;29:6 573-583.
Do dry eye treatments work and which type is most effective? To address these questions, researchers at Glasgow Caledonian University reviewed the outcome of 33 clinical studies published over a 20-year period.
The studies all used rose bengal staining (RB) as an outcome measure, carried out using the classic 0-9 grading scale, before and after the use of artificial tears or ocular lubricants for approximately 30 days. Results include:
· The mean pre-treatment RB score was 4.25, decreasing to 2.84 after treatment, ie a net change of −1.43
· With artificial tears (saline, hypromellose) the net change after one month of treatment was −0.95, with carbomer gels (polyacrylic acid) it was −1.33, and with hyaluronic acid (HA) products −2.10
· The greater change with HA was not associated with a lower final outcome score, but with higher pre-treatment scores
The authors conclude that treating dry eye with artificial tears or lubricants does improve the ocular surface condition. Assuming no improvement without intervention, 30 days’ treatment will produce an overall improvement of around 25%, with little difference between types of treatment. Whether or not a further 25% improvement would occur over a second month of treatment remains unclear.
CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE ABSTRACT OF THE PAPER IN OPO
What we think: An increasing range of dry eye preparations is available either over the counter or on prescription. Eye care professionals will often be asked whether these treatments work and which is the most effective. This study suggests that the types of treatment assessed all improve the ocular surface to a similar extent although improvement may depend on the severity of the condition before treatment.
USE THIS IN YOUR PRACTICE TO:
• Know what to expect of pre and post-treatment staining scores in dry eye
• Advise your patients on current thinking on dry eye therapies
• Point out that these three types of treatment are all similarly effective when used for one month
*NEW* Sultan MB, Mansberger SL and Lee PP. Understanding the importance of IOP variables in glaucoma: a systematic review. Survey of Ophthalmol 2009;54:6 643-662.
Recent guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) have focused attention on the diagnosis and management of glaucoma and ocular hypertension. A major review from the US, published in the current issue of Survey of Ophthalmology, looks at some important aspects of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement.
The paper reviews methods of IOP measurement, their validity and reliability. In particular, it summarises current knowledge of IOP changes over time and the potential impact of such changes on treatment. The authors conclude that:
• A single IOP measurement at a single visit is a poor indicator of IOP levels throughout the day and across visits
• Some attempt should be made to assess IOP at various times during the day and across visits
• Supine IOP measurement or IOP following water drinking may also provide an indication of the range of IOP fluctuation
The authors also suggest that the choice of treatment might be influenced by short or long-term fluctuations in IOP. They conclude that more studies are needed to better understand the value of assessing these changes and their role in the progression of glaucoma.
CLICK HERE TO ACCESS THE ABSTRACT AND FULL TEXT OF THE PAPER
CLICK HERE FOR A QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE TO THE NICE GUIDELINES
CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST GUIDANCE ON REFERRAL OF GLAUCOMA SUSPECTS
What we think: This is a comprehensive review of IOP measurement, written from an ophthalmological perspective. For those with a special interest in the subject, or who need to be familiar with the literature, it’s worth a look.
USE THIS IN YOUR PRACTICE TO:
• Remind yourself that IOP changes over time and realise the limitations of a single measurement in isolation
• Bear this in mind when diagnosing and monitoring glaucoma and ocular hypertension, and when discussing IOPs with patients
• Become familiar with current knowledge in this area, especially when working with ophthalmologists or involved in glaucoma management
Ibrahim YW, Boase DL and Cree IA. Epidemiological characteristics, predisposing factors and microbiological profiles of infectious corneal ulcers: the Portsmouth corneal ulcer study. Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93:1319-1324.
Education is the key to reducing the rate and severity of infectious corneal ulcers, according to a new UK study published in the October issue of the British Journal of Ophthalmology.
Researchers reviewed the records of 1,786 patients with infectious corneal ulcers presenting at the eye casualty department of Queen Alexandra Hospital in Portsmouth over a 7-year period between January 1997 and December 2003. These cases accounted for 3% of total ophthalmic attendees. Among the findings were:
· Contact lens wear was the main predisposing factor, occurring in about three in 10 patients (31%)
· Other important risk factors included ocular diseases (24%), ocular trauma (6%) and systemic diseases (5%), or mixed factors (15%)
· A majority of the bacterial isolates (71%) were Gram-positive bacteria
· Nine out of 11 patients with Acanthamoeba keratitis wore contact lenses
· Most patients (97%) sought medical help more than once
· Only 34 patients (1.9%) had a poor visual outcome
· Follow-up, which reflects the duration of resolution, averaged 11.5 days
The authors note that there has been a declining trend in the rate of contact lens-related keratitis since the late 1990s, although contact lens wear remains the most important risk factor. They conclude that reducing the rate and severity of infectious corneal ulcers requires continuous education of patients, and of professionals.
CLICK HERE TO ACCESS THE FULL TEXT OF THE PAPER
What we think: This study provides a perspective on the proportion of patients presenting with corneal ulcers at a large eye casualty department and the proportion of ulcer cases in which contact lens wear was a factor. It’s important to remember that contact lens -related corneal infections are rare, affecting only about four in 10,000 lens wearers per year, and vision loss due to corneal infection affects only six in 100,000 wearers annually.
USE THIS IN YOUR PRACTICE TO:
•
• Advise patients that problems with contact lenses are rare and more likely to happen when lens wear and care recommendations are not followed
• Reinforce the message that good compliance means more comfortable lenses, longer wearing times and whiter eyes
• Remind patients to check daily that they feel good, look good and see well with their lenses; and to attend regular ongoing aftercare
• Refresh your own knowledge to ensure you’re familiar with the latest thinking on contact lens hygiene
Davies IP and Veys J. The use of fluorescein in contact lens aftercare. Contact Lens Ant Eye 2009 32:4 187-9.
Research among more than 2,000 contact lens practitioners attending THE VISION CARE INSTITUTE™ has shown that many practitioners do not routinely use fluorescein at soft contact lens aftercare visits.
Ian Davies and Jane Veys analysed responses from practitioners from five European countries/regions attending courses at the Institutes in Prague and Milan between July 2006 and March 2008. Participants were asked:
• How often do you stain soft contact lens wearers with fluorescein?
• How much corneal staining do you estimate you see in soft daily wear users?
Interactive voting by 2,116 practitioners choosing from four answer options revealed:
• The UK was the only group in which over half of respondents claimed to use fluorescein at each visit, 75% saying they used it ‘always’ or ‘most of the time’
• Most respondents, with the exception of the UK sample, did not routinely use fluorescein during soft lens aftercare
• Usage did not increase over the study period
• In general, countries that reported using fluorescein the most also reported seeing the highest incidence of corneal staining
The authors argue that concerns about lens discolouration and the risk of infection from fluorescein instillation are unfounded in modern contact lens practice. Education on the value of staining is needed if more practitioners are to use fluorescein more often.
This article was published in Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, and the full text of the paper can be accessed on the link below, with kind permission from Elsevier.
READ MORE
What we think: We recommend that all practitioners instil fluorescein at each soft lens aftercare. Although not all corneal staining is clinically significant or requires intervention, knowing it is present allows an informed clinical judgement to be made.
USE THIS IN YOUR PRACTICE TO:
• Incorporate fluorescein instillation into your soft lens aftercare routine
• Watch the volume used – minimally wet a fluorescein strip with sterile saline – using too much reduces the diagnostic value!
• Find out more about corneal staining and its clinical relevance from the literature using the references provided in this paper
Atkins NP, Morgan SL and Morgan PB. Enhancing the Approach to Selecting Eyewear (EASE): A multi-centre, practice-based study into the effect of applying contact lenses prior to dispensing. Cont Lens Ant Eye 2009 32:3 103-107.
This practice –based study demonstrates that using contact lenses as an aid to spectacle dispensing can result in a higher spend on spectacles and more patients buying contact lenses. The authors recommend offering contact lenses to all suitable patients prior to spectacle dispensing to optimise the dispensing process and to provide an opportunity to try contact lenses.
CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE ABSTRACT AND ACCESS THE FULL TEXT
What we think: Several studies have now shown that proactive recommendation of contact lenses results in significantly greater uptake. Yet according to an Optician survey last month, only one in 10 practitioners introduce the subject with all their patients. Two thirds only discuss contact lenses with those they consider suitable and one in five initiate discussion only if the patient asks.
USE THIS IN YOUR PRACTICE TO:
• Proactively discuss contact lenses with all your patients
• Apply contact lenses as an aid to spectacle dispensing in all those suitable
• Increase your average spend and grow your contact lens practice
• Demonstrate to your staff the business benefits of a proactive approach
Chiu C-J, Klein R, Milton RC et al. Does eating particular diets alter risk of age-related macular degeneration in users of the age-related eye disease study supplements? Br J Ophthalmol published online 12 June 2009;
Eating regular portions of oily fish could help stave off the progression of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), according to the latest findings from the 8-year AREDS (Age Related Eye Disease Study)
A total of 2,924 eligible AREDS participants were randomly assigned to receive one of four regimes: 1) a daily oral placebo; or 2) antioxidants of vitamins C (500mg), E (400IU) and beta carotene (15mg); or 3) the minerals zinc (80mg) and copper (2mg); or 4) the antioxidants plus zinc. Results showed:
• Progression to both dry and wet AMD was 25% less likely among those eating a diet rich in omega-3 fatty acids (DHA or EPA).
• A high omega-3 diet combined with a low glycaemic index (GI) carbohydrate intake reduced the risk of progression to advanced disease even further, cutting it by 50%
The authors suggest that eating two to three servings of oily fish, such as salmon, tuna, mackerel and herring every week, would achieve the recommended daily intake of omega 3, cutting the risk of both early and late stage AMD.
CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE ABSTRACT AND ACCESS THE FULL TEXT
What we think: This latest publication from the AREDS study supports the hypothesis that diet and, where necessary, dietary supplements, may have a role in the prevention of AMD. However, the authors acknowledge that further, long-term study is needed.
USE THIS IN YOUR PRACTICE TO:
• Highlight the association between a healthy diet and healthy sight
• Keep your AMD patients informed of the latest research in this area
• Promote a prevention-based approach to eye health
Morgan P and Efron N. Prescribing Soft Contact lenses for Astigmatism Con Lens Ant Eye 2009 32: 97-98
An analysis of Eurolens Annual Fitting Survey data over a ten year period, shows toric lens fitting as a proportion of all soft lens fits has increased in the UK, but a number of astigmats remain not fully corrected, with visual compromise more prevalent in daily disposable wearers.
Relevance: Are we doing all we can for our astigmatic Patients? Astigmatic patients deserve the same considerations for contact lenses in terms of vision, comfort and health as do our spherical patients. Historically, we may have been limited by product availability and performance, but with the advancement of lens design and materials, astigmats can and should be offered successful contact lens options.
CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE
Walline et al. Randomised Trial of Effect of Contact lens Wear on Self-Perception in Children. Optom Vis Sci 86;3 222-232
This study shows correcting vision with contact lenses can improve children’s self perception in areas of physical appearance, athletic competence and social acceptance, compared to spectacle wear.
Relevance: Practitioners should consider the social and visual benefits of contact lens wear when advising vision correction options for children as young as 8.
CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE
Blakeney S. Infection Control in Optometric Practice. Optometry in Practice 2009 10: 1-12
The importance of infection control goes beyond the confines of hospitals and health care institutions. This article reviews it’s relevance in optical practice, providing rationale, guidance and advice on hand hygiene, equipment decontamination and disposal of clinical waste.
Relevance: Practitioners need to ensure appropriate arrangements for infection control and decontamination in their practice. Awareness, staff training and regular auditing should be considered.
CLICK HERE TO ACCESS NEW COLLEGE GUIDELINES